|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 17:13:04 GMT -5
speaking all in lowercaps too easy?
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 17:14:44 GMT -5
Probably. Maybe no punctuation? Although that would prevent you from using long posts.
|
|
|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 17:16:07 GMT -5
unfortunately I think Frostmist may have already done the lowercase thing (thats the only thing I can notice).
Is the l337 speak too annoying or you think it could fly?
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 17:18:35 GMT -5
I'd be hesitant to go with leet speak, its annoying, and noticeably harder than every restriction I've seen to date.
The restrictions in this game seem pretty simple.
|
|
|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 17:34:06 GMT -5
how about storyteller mode? Or I can't refer to people by their names except when I vote?
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 17:44:05 GMT -5
How about instead of names you have to refer to them by their sign up number in the OP?
Ex: You can't say Varcayn you have to say #12. (Excluding voting)
|
|
|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 17:51:16 GMT -5
problem with that is no-one has a restriction that interferes with them voting. So that might be a tip off.
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 18:01:30 GMT -5
I'm quickly running out of ideas that aren't already mentioned on the first page or already in use.
How about you have to vary the actual font you type in, as opposed to syntax or size? Ex: vary between Times New Roman, Arial, Comic Sans and a few others several times per post, much in the same way Shamus is varying between bold, italics, and underline.
|
|
|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 18:05:12 GMT -5
k that sounds the best so far.
|
|
|
Post by Devoutly Apathetic on Mar 24, 2008 18:06:46 GMT -5
I don't think I've every seen anybody use a different font on the board.
|
|
|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 18:13:03 GMT -5
hopefully it will fly. Seems like a pain but still doable- so its plausible. Thanks for the suggestion milo.
I just sent to thorgot- " I have to change fonts every sentence".
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 18:14:15 GMT -5
I don't know about you two, but thorgot asked that I PM him with whatever fake restriction I was going for, so don't forget that if you need to. I think we'll blend in alright with these three.
|
|
|
Post by invisibleman on Mar 24, 2008 18:23:34 GMT -5
I pm'd him with mine, so who do you guys want to take out tonight? I think Oatway and Shamus both give hints they may be the guardian.
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 18:26:44 GMT -5
We might be able to get Shamus to bite the vote. If you come back and post something to the extent of "Shamus seemed awfully quick to throw blame on people that were inactive for only half a day" and then vote for him that might turn it.
On the other hand that might look suspicious coming so closely after DA, so lets discuss this first.
Also, I bet the guardian will be lying low. Killing him is the key to our victory.
|
|
milo
New Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by milo on Mar 24, 2008 18:28:17 GMT -5
Also, PL1 seems to have to post using sexual innuendos.
|
|