|
Post by Satan Himself on Dec 18, 2007 22:15:54 GMT -5
The dead from night two:
DasUberEdward - Forumer Cuddleton, the Epilepsy Lemur (Frosteey) - Forumer Fluffy, Our Beloved Flopsy Bunny Friend - Ex-Mod mtvcdm - Admin's Friend Richy - Jerk
We were also responsible for DasUberEdward. JamieK led the charge on our end and I followed by befriending Zot. That was enough to decrease my vote count and put Edward on the block.
We took down one seer in mtvcdm. There could be more still.
What is a jerk? It's a still-hidden mechanic to us. It could be the vigilante, explaining Fluffy's death.
The EPIC REVEAL of the 21+ poster is scary. However with the (most likely) one seer left that strategy will be harder to enact.
|
|
|
Post by Satan Himself on Dec 18, 2007 22:25:32 GMT -5
OK so I should never post from my phone again. I'll just come back later when I have access to my computers (power is out)
|
|
|
Post by One Thousand Dicks on Dec 18, 2007 22:49:39 GMT -5
I gotta say, the drunk posting mechanic is fucking brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by Satan Himself on Dec 18, 2007 23:01:20 GMT -5
So I totally fucked up. I had lost power at my apartment and had to use my phone. It drew the posts strangely and I read mtvcdm as the village kill (first name in list). I don't know if it would help of someone agreed with Umlauts, you might get taken down with us.
Throw me to the dogs, I doubt I will survive this day.
|
|
|
Post by Satan Himself on Dec 18, 2007 23:56:05 GMT -5
How about we kill Umlauts tomorrow? Is it too obvious that we're making Sabs and Zot the scapegoats?
|
|
|
Post by loudcash on Dec 19, 2007 6:26:22 GMT -5
At *first* I was thinking, "Shit, if we kill Sab and Zot, that'll look *so suspicious*! It'll be blatantly obvious we're trying to get rid of our enemies! But more importantly, if we *don't* take them out, it'll be *apparent* that it's us. Because if the bad guys were anyone else, the very smartest and *first* thing they'd do, is kill Sab and Zot to frame Satan. The only way to clear Satan's name is to make him and Pretentious look guilty. Make it an *obvious* frame. Otherwise, it'll just look be too suspicious that in this huge debate, no one in it actually got killed. How suspicious does it look when a bunch of inactives get killed in all this turmoil? *Very fucking suspicious*! Unless we kill Pretentious and Satan to divert attention entirely. Anyhow, here's my vote. Zot, Sab and Pretentious. All that will be left will be wild fucking speculation.
|
|
Quid
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by Quid on Dec 19, 2007 11:01:01 GMT -5
You must come out against X declaring you have it on good authority that they're evil. You're in contact with a seer and speaking for them to get X killed. You must, for the rest of this game, do this to the best of your ability.
Does that sound good? Think it might work against werehippy if we used it on someone?
|
|
Quid
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by Quid on Dec 19, 2007 12:13:03 GMT -5
Or shit, have werehippy declare someone evil and watch the backlash.
Edit: Unless he's immune to that too. I'm assuming he is but asking for clarification.
|
|
Quid
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by Quid on Dec 19, 2007 12:57:25 GMT -5
OH SHIT 21+ ARE ONLY IMMUNE TO KILLS.
So besides accusing some innocents until he gets a terrible backlash, any other ideas of what I could have werehippy do?
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 19, 2007 13:12:29 GMT -5
I was thinking we could just simply make Werehippy abstain from drinking and then kill him, thus sinking the whole network, but have you tested to see how the girl mechanic shows up in narration? Because if Tube says you were the one who forced him to stop drinking, that will implicate us.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 19, 2007 13:14:01 GMT -5
or implicate you, more specifically.
I think it would be a LOT more fun, if not necessarily the most effective strategy, to force Werehippy to falsely accuse people during his one "sober" post, and then force him to post drunk for the rest of the evening.
|
|
|
Post by Idi Admin on Dec 19, 2007 13:15:35 GMT -5
Uh, in case it wasn't clear, that person will be under your control for the next day and only that day. You can use your powers on him the next day to make him do something again.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 19, 2007 13:21:53 GMT -5
Will you answer whether it appears in narration? Because that's a pretty key component.
|
|
|
Post by Idi Admin on Dec 19, 2007 13:36:41 GMT -5
Will you answer whether it appears in narration? Because that's a pretty key component. it will not appear in the narration.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 19, 2007 13:38:22 GMT -5
Thanks!
Then a pretty easy solution is to force werehippy not to drink and then we can just kill him, although false accusations might prove more entertaining. Waiting to see if JamesKeenan finds anthing out, too.
|
|