ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 17:57:55 GMT -5
Yeah, this is celery. I changed my login cuz DA said the memberlist was viewable. I'm a bad guy, don't worry. Let's not off me.
|
|
|
Post by loudcash on Dec 18, 2007 18:01:41 GMT -5
3rd post rocking.
Has anyone ever tried a strat where one of the bad guys acts blatantly bad and another bad guy adamantly defends him. The village is meant to see this.
The remaining bad guys, or most of them, then proceed to out and expose either of them, while the village (and the remaining bad guys) take out the second.
This gives the illusion of progress, while clearing the name absolutely of the bad guys.
Would that work? As I'm brining it up, I'd be willing to go for either of the sacrificial roles.
|
|
|
Post by loudcash on Dec 18, 2007 18:02:17 GMT -5
lol
I know.
I love you celery, I wouldn't off you.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 18:06:04 GMT -5
I was thinking it's important that we don't appear aligned with each other.
I was considering acting a little belligerent if I ever get outed as a bad guy, starting to chew my coraiders out like crazy, and throwing out a ton of random names as co-conspirators. That's one of the reasons I haven't been shy about putting myself forward.
It would be a little tricky if one of us named ourselves the good guys without knowing who the other good guys are, because if they're smart and don't contact us, they could just see us and expose the whole conspiracy.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 18:11:42 GMT -5
Should we off Frosteey or leave it to avoid getting attention?
|
|
|
Post by loudcash on Dec 18, 2007 18:27:43 GMT -5
I think Frosteey may very well get voted off because of the name issue.
|
|
|
Post by loudcash on Dec 18, 2007 18:29:22 GMT -5
In fact, I think it's inadvisable to knock off anyone on the voting list. That way no real information can be gleaned from our actions.
Unless they decide the bad guys voted as they did just *because* there were bad guys on the voting list.
Who knows.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 18:38:55 GMT -5
I don't mind tying it into the voting as long as it's not our advocacy that put them on the list. Another good thing is that we're spreading our votes, that way it won't appear to be a straight conspiracy.
Anyway I like our three names, because mtvcdm is acting a little weird to me. I definitely want him gone, but there's nobody else I'm dead set on. Zot maybe, but we'd be too implicated.
We could just do mtvcdm, Frosteey, and Zot, and maybe one of us would get voted out, but we'd still have 3 kills even if one of us died.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 18:44:16 GMT -5
Eh -- I gotta go, and at least for tonight I'm pretty comfortable with kakos, mtvcdm, and iamtheaznman. I'm going to PM those three to Tube, feel free to amend them.
No matter what, I want mtvcdm gone after tonight, though. The Edward pick was too weird and he seemed eager to protect Frosteey.
|
|
|
Post by Satan Himself on Dec 18, 2007 18:54:19 GMT -5
if no one else responds, I'm going to PM those to Tube around 4 PST with the same instructions as last time, to take any further input from you guys as final if you want to change. You really don't need to keep sending in orders, especially so early. It's basically a guarentee I'll be around at closing to submit. I'm sure someone else can be if we need it. I don't want to create more work for teh modz. I'm not going to post much in the thread substantially tonight because people are getting pissy about Zot. I'm sorry, he bitched and kept bitching. Fuck him. Vote for me if you want in the thread, I'm not going to cry over it. Unfortunately he's invulnerable to us now because if he goes down anytime within the next couple days, everyone will assume I did it. mtvcdm talks too much and needs to be eliminated. Gumpy shouldn't be killed because he's a vocal Zot sympathizer and people will bandwagon me immediately. Richy is Canadian, and therefore scum but I can't really give a better reason than that.
|
|
|
Post by Satan Himself on Dec 18, 2007 18:55:21 GMT -5
3rd post rocking. Has anyone ever tried a strat where one of the bad guys acts blatantly bad and another bad guy adamantly defends him. The village is meant to see this. The remaining bad guys, or most of them, then proceed to out and expose either of them, while the village (and the remaining bad guys) take out the second. This gives the illusion of progress, while clearing the name absolutely of the bad guys. Would that work? As I'm brining it up, I'd be willing to go for either of the sacrificial roles. Yeah, that can work. I wish roles weren't revealed upon death. I'd be willing to take a kill to confuse the shit out of people.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 19:05:08 GMT -5
Okay -- just about to head out the door.
Sorry about the early PM thing, I'll knock it off -- no one had said concretely that they would take responsibility for the final submission so I just figured better safe than sorry. If you take responsibility Satan, I'm good with that.
Also I was thinking -- if you are leading in the vote tonight, ABSOLUTELY eliminate Zot, so it will just look like a last-ditch revenge kill since you'll be outed as a raider anyway. So if you're going down Satan, take Zot and mtvcdm for certain, and then just choose someone else after that.
|
|
Quid
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by Quid on Dec 18, 2007 19:07:09 GMT -5
Things aren't going well for you Satan.
|
|
Quid
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by Quid on Dec 18, 2007 19:07:46 GMT -5
Also, edward is being too smart for my liking.
|
|
ct
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ct on Dec 18, 2007 19:10:15 GMT -5
Seriously though if Satan goes down and Zot is eliminated in the same night, it'll do wonders to help cover up the fact that there's a 6 person conspiracy.
|
|